.
ER Editor: This is a city and region we know very well indeed. In normal times, it was just relaxed and tolerant. But also very ripe for manipulative politicizing by the globalist Left/’woke’ entrapment. People there are very much asleep and need waking up. Be careful of the woke choices you make and the governments you support because they will come back to bite you in the proverbial. That’s the lesson we’re smelling from this.
Property prices have always been high in this region, incidentally. It’s a magnet for Chinese money, legal and otherwise, going back some time. Leadership of Indian bands in Canada is known to be corrupt and on-the-take.
********
BREAKING: Canada hands control of Vancouver to Musqueam Indian Band
A must-read story presenting more evidence that, thanks to Canada and provincial policies, British Columbia is now in full-bore suicide mode.
An urgent freedom of information request is required to determine the contents of a land giveaway agreement of a huge slice of the province that was occasionally occupied but never formally owned by the Musqueam Indian Band and neighbouring groups.
Also see another take on this same issue here.
A map of the enormous claimed area is shown below in pink:
Canada hands control of Vancouver to Musqueam Indian Band
The Liberal government is refusing to publicly release an agreement with the Musqueam Indian Band that recognizes Aboriginal title over a vast area of British Columbia.
Cosmin Dzsurdzsa
Juno News
March 1, 2026
The Liberal government is refusing to publicly release an agreement with the Musqueam Indian Band that recognizes Aboriginal title over a vast area of British Columbia, including Metro Vancouver and surrounding areas, potentially affecting nearly two million people.
Buried in a seemingly mundane fisheries announcement put out on February 20th, the acknowledgement could radically undermine property rights in one of Canada’s largest and most populated metropolitan regions.
On February 20, Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada issued a news release with little fanfare titled “Musqueam and Canada Sign Historic Agreements Recognizing Rights, Stewardship and Fisheries.”
The news release reads: Canada “recognizes that Musqueam has Aboriginal rights including title within their traditional territory and establishes a framework for incremental implementation of rights and nation-to-nation relations with Canada.”
That phrase “including title” refers to Aboriginal title. Under Canadian constitutional law, Aboriginal title is a contentious but increasingly recognized property interest, affirmed by recent court rulings, including the controversial Cowichan decision. Courts have recognized Aboriginal title as a prior and senior right to land that critics say threatens fee simple title or traditional private property ownership in Canada.
The Musqueam Indian Band’s traditional territory encompasses virtually all of Metro Vancouver, including Vancouver, West Vancouver, North Vancouver, Burnaby, Richmond, New Westminster, parts of Delta and Surrey and other regions.
Based on 2021 census and other data, that territory is home to an estimated 1.8 million British Columbians.
The federal government has now formally recognized in writing Musqueam Indian Band’s Aboriginal title over that territory, yet Crown-Indigenous Relations and Northern Affairs Canada refuses to make the agreement public.
The February 20 announcement specifically refers to the “šxʷq̓ʷal̕təl̕tən Rights Recognition Agreement,” described as recognizing Musqueam’s Aboriginal rights, “including title” and establishing a framework for implementation.
Musqueam Chief Wayne Sparrow emphasized the Aboriginal title component directly in the release:
“Our Musqueam community celebrates these historic agreements as a step forward in our path to Reconciliation. In signing these agreements, the Government of Canada is acknowledging Musqueam’s Aboriginal title and rights to our traditional territory and recognizing our expertise in both marine management and fisheries management,” Sparrow said.
But when Juno News requested a copy of the agreement from Crown-Indigenous Relations, the department’s media relations spokesperson Eric Head confirmed receipt of the request and then cut communication altogether, even when pressed to ask if the agreement would be made public.
After mocking private property concerns, Eby now worried about Cowichan decision
OCTOBER 20, 2025
B.C. Premier David Eby is now “sharing the concerns” over the Cowichan Aboriginal title court decision that could impact private property rights, a decision he largely influenced as the former attorney general by abandoning a key legal defense.
Repeated follow-ups for comment by Juno News went unanswered. As of publication, the department has not provided the document nor commented on the scope or legal implications of recognizing Aboriginal title across Metro Vancouver and surrounding areas.
A search of the Canada Gazette, the Aboriginal and Treaty Rights Information System and federal open data portals yields no publicly available copy of the signed agreement.
Aboriginal title has become a glaring problem for the governing B.C. NDP (ER: globalist woke Left) after the B.C. Supreme Court ruled in favour of Aboriginal title in the Cowichan Tribes v. Canada decision. In the ruling, Justice Barbara Young recognized Aboriginal title over portions of Richmond, which Cowichan Tribes claimed as a historic fishing settlement, declaring it “a prior and senior right to land.”
The ruling threatens to invalidate certain land titles held by Canada and the City of Richmond and instructs governments to negotiate in good faith. The case affects private homes, commercial properties and land surrounding key infrastructure and has sent a shockwave of concerns among local property owners.
That decision is now under appeal with multiple parties involved, including the Musqueam, the City of Richmond and both federal and provincial governments.
Richmond residents tell town hall they were left in the dark on Cowichan ruling
ALEX ZOLTAN
OCTOBER 29, 2025
Richmond homeowners, city officials, lawyers, politicians, and concerned citizens packed a town hall on Tuesday to discuss a recent B.C. Supreme Court decision that’s got everyone wondering: what’s next for private property rights in Canada?
Ottawa’s recognition of Musqueam Aboriginal title across its traditional territory complicates things further.
If courts affirm that Aboriginal title can supersede or significantly constrain fee simple ownership, then an agreement signed by the federal government that recognized Aboriginal title over all of Metro Vancouver could be called upon in future court showdowns.
Additionally, Musqueam’s traditional territory overlaps with areas also claimed by the Tsleil-Waututh and Squamish Nations. The North Shore and Burrard Inlet region have long been the subject of layered historical occupation and conflicting claims.
The federal agreement reportedly establishes a “framework for incremental implementation of rights and nation-to-nation relations.” But without public disclosure, neither residents nor journalists can assess what that framework entails.
A guest post by Cosmin Dzsurdzsa
Opinions are my own. Senior Researcher True North // Formerly Senior Editor The Post Millennial +It’s pronounced: Jurja | Alumnus: University of Waterloo
© 2026 Candice Malcolm
Source
Featured image source, Vancouver: https://www.cntraveller.com/gallery/vancouver-canada-best-things-to-do
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply