.
ER Editor: A reminder that 7 vaccine-injured Dutch people have brought a case against Bill Gates, Alberta Bourla, Mark Rutte, the Dutch government, &etc. bringing the number of defendants, curiously, to 17.
Counsel for the plaintiffs, Peter Stassen, is trying to get a number of distinguished experts to testify, names that we know such as Dr. Mike Yeadon, Dr. Joseph Sansone, Catherine Austin Fitts, &etc. This group of experts was supposed to include Dr. Francis Boyle, who sadly passed.
This wide-ranging expert testimony was previously denied, prompting Stassen to appeal the decision. Here’s an update on that appeal, with a tweet by Andrew Bridgen below, who was present in court today with podcaster Dani Henderson —
A ruling on today’s appeal in Amsterdam, (in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer), former Dutch PM, media and health ministers) will be delivered on 9th April 2026. The decision will determine whether the high court will allow the district court to hear… pic.twitter.com/CquSx0xJLN
— Fiona Rose Diamond (@CoviLeaks) March 9, 2026
TEXT
A ruling on today’s appeal in Amsterdam, (in the case against Bill Gates, Albert Bourla (CEO of Pfizer), former Dutch PM, media and health ministers) will be delivered on 9th April 2026.
The decision will determine whether the high court will allow the district court to hear expert witness testimony from Dr Mike Yeadon (former Pfizer VP), Sasha Latypova (former Pharma executive and researcher), Katherine Watt (international law expert and legal analyst), Catherine Austin Fitts (financial analyst and former US government official), and Dr Joseph Sansone (clinical psychologist) in a preliminary pre-trial evidence hearing ahead of the main civil case.
That civil trial – brought by seven Pfizer ‘vaccine’-injured claimants – is currently expected to take place sometime between May and October 2026, though no exact date has yet been set. Today’s hearing was not about deciding the case itself. It was about whether the court should allow an appeal against the refusal to examine key evidence and expert witnesses before trial.
The main lawsuit will proceed regardless of the outcome – but if the appeal succeeds, it kicks the door wide open to early scrutiny of the evidence… and disclosure from the defendants. If it fails, the claimants may still present those experts later during the normal trial process.
Good litigators, like Peter Stassen (pictured in the blue suit) don’t walk into court with one argument and hope for the best – they attack from every possible angle. You build multiple legal pathways, so the case can’t simply be shut down with a single ruling. If one argument falls, another survives. It forces the court to engage with the evidence, makes early dismissal harder, and compels disclosure, witnesses and scrutiny. In complex cases involving governments, corporations and media, each party has different legal duties, so the case must be constructed broadly. It’s not chaos – it’s strategy. That’s what serious litigation looks like when the stakes are high!
Lawyer Peter Stassen was an absolute rottweiler (but clear humanitarian) in court. He held nothing back, stated that Bill Gates was a “satanist in the Epstein files,” “protected by black cloaks” and that he should be charged as a criminal. He argued the global significance of this case and is pushing relentlessly for the right to bring expert evidence before the court. He made it clear he intends to pursue this case from every possible legal angle, and that he will not stop until that evidence is heard.
There are essentially two connected cases here. Today’s hearing concerned a preliminary evidentiary procedure, filed after the main lawsuit. Both cases involve the same defendants, the same facts, and the same legal team, representing seven Pfizer vaccine-injured claimants. I’ll be sharing the full transcript and overview in English tomorrow morning across my socials. There is one ultimate objective: justice, accountability, and truth. I will leave you with what Peter Stassen left the court Justices with:
“You, your honours, will have to decide who are the children of God in this room, and who are the children of the Devil.”
LINK
Short report on this mornings proceedings in the appeal court in Amsterdam. pic.twitter.com/crFY8B5GeC
— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) March 9, 2026
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply