.
ER Editor: On one level, this all seems absurd. Anybody with eyes can see this is already going on.
This kind of spraying was happening full-on and daily from April 2015 onwards over western European cities, and the contents were highly toxic for many people in different countries. However, while the spraying certainly continued, toxicity levels went down around 2019 or 2020. We know this personally because we were involved in anti-geoengineering activism, and our toxicity levels were high to the point of sickness around 2015 onwards.
Yet such an absurd announcement by the UK govt is actually quite clever for waking up those who refuse to look up, and who refuse to accept their government would ever do such a thing. And for those who deny the existence of the phenomenon in the first place. It’s putting the concept out onto a sleeping public, and giving them one more reason to rail against their government. Again, we believe it is the white hats trying to bring sleepers on board.
***
We issue an MSM warning for The Guardian report below, which buys into many stupid assumptions, including the climate nonsense and the ‘we’re not going to put anything toxic into the air’ claim. Rather like those safe and effective genetic shots.
***
The Government announce that they are starting geoengineering (cloud seeding/ weather manipulation ) over the UK within weeks , because too many people now know they have been doing it for years.
The Government are bringing in The Assisted Dying Bill ( voluntary euthanasia )…— Andrew Bridgen (@ABridgen) April 23, 2025
Ticking all the boxes of gaslighting, trolling,misinformation and disinformation with this one absolutely pathetic. https://t.co/g1BYpdUQTy pic.twitter.com/OEaI8cRguM
— 🇬🇧 Grahame 🇬🇧 (@thebattler180) April 23, 2025
“Now we’re faced with the prospects of this radical experiment”
This week the British Government finally tell us they’re going to start ‘Conducting Geo-Engineering Trials to combat Climate Change’.
Those paying attention know these trials have already been happening for… pic.twitter.com/rExpiTlfM1
— Concerned Citizen (@BGatesIsaPyscho) April 23, 2025
Many years, not two —
🇬🇧 Cloud Seeding? Try Cloud Deceiving – Government Scrambles to Justify Two Years of Weather Manipulation.
It’s official, the UK government has “greenlit” £50 million in geoengineering experiments, including so-called “solar radiation management” and cloud brightening. They… pic.twitter.com/o4IpAOOIGJ
— MarXmeN (@10MarXmen) April 23, 2025
Embedding Alex Jones —
This is the UK in 2025 after years of denial geo-engineering was a real thing:
🔹no information
🔹no public consultation
🔹no national referendum
🔹no publication of the economic, health and environmental risk assessmentsWe simply have to accept being sprayed like insects,… https://t.co/hfVgT81hAL
— Dr. Nick K (@nickkeca) April 24, 2025
********
UK scientists to launch outdoor geoengineering experiments
Blocking sunlight could temporarily slow the climate crisis but the technologies remain highly controversial
DAMIAN CARRINGTON for THE GUARDIAN
UK scientists are to launch outdoor geoengineering experiments as part of a £50m government-funded programme.
The experiments will be small-scale and rigorously assessed, according to Advanced Research and Invention Agency (Aria), the UK government agency backing the plan, and will provide “critical” data needed to assess the potential of the technology. The programme, along with another £11m project, will make the UK one of the biggest funders of geoengineering research in the world.
Geoengineering is controversial and some previous planned outdoor experiments have been cancelled after strong opposition. Most geoengineering proposals aim to block sunlight reaching the Earth’s surface, for example by launching clouds of reflective particles into the atmosphere or using seawater sprays to make clouds brighter. (ER: Or simply getting government-employed pilots to dump tons of toxic substances like aluminium, strontium, barium, depleted uranium and mercury into the air over our heads each and every day.)
If successful, this could temporarily reduce surface temperatures and the harm the climate crisis is causing, giving more time for the deep cuts in global carbon emissions needed. Given the failure of the world to stop emissions rising to date, and the recent run of record hot years, backers of solar geoengineering say researching the issue is vital in case an emergency brake is needed.
However, solar radiation management (SRM) could have serious unintended consequences, such as shifting rains vital to food production (ER: producing drought from dessicating chemicals such as aluminium). Some scientists warn that starting to develop geoengineering could reduce the drive to tackle the root cause of the climate emergency – the burning of fossil fuels. (ER: good grief)
ER: Cue Climate nonsense …
Prof Mark Symes, who is leading the Aria programme, said the looming threat of climate tipping points was a strong reason to research solar geoengineering. The triggering of tipping points by rising temperatures, such as the collapse of vital ocean currents or giant ice sheets, would have catastrophic impacts.
“The uncomfortable truth is that our current warming trajectory makes a number of such tipping points distinctly possible over the next century,” he said. “This has driven increased interest in approaches that might actively cool the world in a short timeframe in order to avoid those tipping points.
“Having spoken to hundreds of researchers, we reached the conclusion that a critical missing part of our understanding was real world, physical data. These would show us whether any of these potential approaches would actually work and what their effects might be. Modelling and indoor studies are essential as prerequisites but can only tell us so much.”
He said no toxic substances would be released, an environmental impact assessment would be published before outdoor experiments and that local communities would be consulted. Details of the projects funded by Aria are expected in a few weeks.
Aria’s programme was recently called a “dangerous distraction” from cutting emissions by senior scientists, who called SRM “barking mad” and akin to treating cancer with aspirin.
A £10m programme of geoengineering research was announced by the UK’s National Environment Research Council (Nerc) on 3 April to investigate the impact of solar geoengineering interventions. It will not involve new outdoor experiments but rely on computer modelling, existing data and natural analogues, such as volcanic eruptions and changes in shipping emissions.
“Our role is to provide the best possible, robust evidence, but without advocating for [geoengineering] one way or the other,” said Kate Hamer, a director at Nerc.
Global funding for geoengineering to date is relatively small compared with climate science overall, being in the low hundreds of millions of dollars, according to Dr Pete Irvine from the University of Chicago. The US was the leading funder but President Donald Trump’s attack on climate research (ER: whew …) is expected to reduce this, potentially making the UK the leading funder. “It’s worth stressing that geoengineering is not a substitute for emission cuts,” Irvine said.
CONTINUE READING HERE
Featured image source: https://eu.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2016/08/16/scientists-say-chemtrail-conspiracy-theory-isnt-real/88821176/
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply