Shocking Foreign Interference in France’s Electoral Process

ER Editor: Scholz’, Costa’s and Sanchez’ letter in Le Monde is highly predictable nonsense (browsers will translate), labelling Le Pen ‘far right’ when her program shares about a 75% similarity with ‘far left’ candidate Jean-Luc Melenchon. You’d think as political leaders they’d get their basic terminology correct. And yes, those nasty populists just adore Vladimir Putin. They really do take us for idiots.

As Dussart reminds us below, the Spanish leader’s treatment of the Covid plandemic, whose anti-democratic measures earned him the rebuke of his own constitutional courts, puts him in no position to lecture others on ‘democratic values’. Nothing that Macron has done for several years, either, has been wanted by the majority of the French. This government is facing its own lawsuits over its liberty-destroying plandemic management. Ask thousands of Yellow Vests about government repression.

But the main takeaway is simply that there is ZERO RESPECT for national sovereignty of ANY European nation in these people’s minds, as Dussart indicates. That leaders of other countries should attempt to interfere in the election process of another is simply unheard of.

This is how much a Le Pen presidency scares the French and European establishment.

********

Foreign interference in the electoral process

TERESITA DUSSART for FRANCESOIR

CHRONICLE — On April 21, four days before the second round of the presidential election, three foreign heads of state – Olaf Scholz of Germany, Antonio Costa of Portugal, and Pedro Sanchez of Spain – signed a platform in the columns of the newspaper Le Monde explicitly calling on the French to vote for Emmanuel Macron.

From left to right, German Olaf Scholz, Spaniard Pedro Sanchez, and Portuguese Antonio Costa, during a European Union summit in Brussels, February 24, 2022.  GEERT VANDEN WIJNGAERT / POOL / AFP

.

Never, ever in contemporary political history, have foreign powers explicitly given voting instructions in a foreign electoral process. Even less by incumbent heads of state. Interference, in the definition of Larousse, consists of “the intervention of a State in the policy of another”. Is there anything more political than the election of a free people to define to whom they will entrust the next mandate?

The tribune begins in its title by asking the French to consider that the interests which would be theirs come after the needs of Spain, Portugal and Germany. “We need a France that defends our common values,” they write.

Marine Le Pen is described as the “candidate who openly sides with those who threaten our freedom and democracy”. Just that. All terms of the proposal are subject to question. What do these proxies mean by “openly”? Where, when and in what terms did they hear Marine Le Pen “side” with someone who would threaten our democracy? This forum is an anthological case of defamation, if not a gigantic fake used in the context of a precedent of interference never seen before.

But even more, what lesson of democracy can a Pedro Sanchez give to the French people in terms of democracy? All decisions that the Spanish socialist has taken within the framework of Covid management have been systematically invalidated by the Supreme Court of that country. Never before has anyone in the history of post-Franco Spain done so much to suppress the guarantees of the rule of law and been so scolded about the limits of executive power.

Invested with what legitimacy does Sanchez arrogate to himself the right to infantilize the French and to give voting instructions, he who came to power by taking advantage of a constitutional loophole to organize a kind of parliamentary coup, allying itself with the most extreme nationalist groups in Spain.

During the last presidential election in the United States, the mainstream press made the fantasy of Russian interference a central issue, prompting a double investigation by Congress and the FBI, from which nothing emerged that did not prove these allegations. But if there was interference, it would have been on the order of abstruse, secret, occult operations. Here, it is about heads of state who, losing all sense of modesty, interfere, all shame drunk, in the most sacred moment of the democratic life of a nation: that of the vote.

A deputy from a foreign nation may express opinions about a candidate in a third nation, but a head of state giving voting instructions opens the door to the desecration of national sovereignty. Do you have to get used to that too? Were they to do so with an African or Latin American nation, it would almost become, if not a casus belli, at least a diplomatic incident of extraordinary gravity.

In the tribune of friends Sanchez, Costa and Scholz, there’s not a word about the Macron government’s subjugation to the American firm McKinsey. In this case, however, the French have indeed been “openly” “sided” with those who have not only threatened, but very directly undermined their freedom and their democracy. Because the real Defense Council which has marked time over the past two years and decided how the French should live to the very depths of their physical integrity, from their right to medical secrecy to the way in which they intended to educate their children, is none other than the McKinsey company.

In addition to the interference in itself, this platform responds to an act of lobbying in favor of community clientelism for the bad governments of southern Europe, and of the continuity of French subjugation to the interests of Germany, of which France could not highlight a single example of recognition or loyalty for thirty years.

************

Source

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

8 Comments on Shocking Foreign Interference in France’s Electoral Process

  1. The company would be in Austin Texas, says François de Siebenthal in the first minutes of the video, citing François Asselineau (the rest of the video is an anti-PCC report and other subjects). But it is an international network.
    I cannot search more in my files due to a big lack of time at the moment, sorry.
    I am sure many informations will surface again because now the time has come finally : the French are now accepting to face the reality that ALSO the votes are doctored, like everything else. We are at a turning point and there will be a wave of disclosures.
    So when I come across more information I’ll be back.

    Expert en sécurité électorale dévoile tout; Infiltration mondiale des membres du régime chinois
    Sortie le 23 déc. 2020

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CpaP73nHr6M

  2. In the DOM TOM the counts are still made like before Sarkozy by the préfectures.

    In mainland France the counts of the votes are made in the US by a US company.

  3. Partial Results from the Dom Tom (=Départements et Territoires d’Outre-Mer = overseas french départements) : massive vote for Marine Le Pen :

    resultat partiel reçu des dom tom
    https://lesmoutonsenrages.fr/2022/04/24/resultat-partiel-recu-des-dom-tom/
    dimanche 24 avril 2022

    Baie-mahault
    Bureau centralisateur
    MLP 231 : 70,2%
    EM 98 : 29.8%

    La Desirade
    MLP : 80%
    EM : 20%

    Petit bourg
    Resultats
    MLP 5167 soit 63,65%
    Macron 2958 soit 36,44%

    Bureau de vote gascon à moule
    le pen 544 macron 180

    Bureau 218 Abymes
    399 votants
    Macron 105
    Lepen 251
    Blancs 21
    Nuls 22

    Bureau 225
    LE PEN 310
    MACRON 79

    Bureau 5 à Viard Ste Rose, final : MLP : 265, M : 59

    Resultat de bureau de pointe noire:
    MACRON: 103
    LE PEN : 297
    NULS: 25
    BLANCS: 24

    Bureau 2 capesterre belle eau :
    Macron: 40
    Le Pen:156

    Définitif capesterre belle eau :
    Le Pen : 5284
    Macron : 1417

    Lamentin
    Mlp 4134
    Macron 1434

    Résultat définitif St François
    MLP 3782
    EM 1806

    Voici ci-dessous les résultats de Saint-Martin –

    MACRON : 2 591
    LE PEN : 3 265

    Guyane :

    CAYENNE DEFINITIF
    Le Pen 5771
    Macron 3041

    KOUROU DEFINITIF
    Le Pen 2244
    Macron 1798

    St. LAURENT
    le Pen 1576
    Macron 1428

    Baie-mahault
    Bureau centralisateur
    MLP 231 : 70,2%
    EM 98 : 29.8%

    La Desirade
    MLP : 80%
    EM : 20%

    Petit bourg
    Resultats
    MLP 5167 soit 63,65%
    Macron 2958 soit36,44%

    Bureau de vote gascon à moule
    le pen 544 macron 180

    Bureau 218 Abymes
    399 votants
    Macron 105
    Lepen 251
    Blancs 21
    Nuls 22

    Bureau 225
    LE PEN 310
    MACRON 79

    Bureau 5 à Viard Ste Rose, final : MLP : 265, M : 59

    Resultat de bureau de pointe noire:
    MACRON: 103
    LE PEN : 297
    NULS: 25
    BLANCS: 24

    Bureau 2 capesterre belle eau :
    Macron: 40
    Le Pen:156

    Définitif capesterre belle eau :
    Le Pen : 5284
    Macron : 1417

    Lamentin
    Mlp 4134
    Macron 1434

    Résultat définitif St François
    MLP 3782
    EM 1806

    Voici ci-dessous les résultats de Saint-Martin –

    MACRON : 2 591
    LE PEN : 3 265

    Guyane :

    CAYENNE DEFINITIF
    Le Pen 5771
    Macron 3041

    KOUROU DEFINITIF
    Le Pen 2244
    Macron 1798

    St. LAURENT
    le Pen 1576
    Macron 1428

  4. Lau Rbd
    @RbdLau
    En réponse à @BFMTV
    Macron est venu à figeac avec 6 bus de militants. Alors arrêtez de faire croire que ce sont les figeacois qui applaudissent !
    Il est venu avec sa propre foule pour ne pas affronter la réalité sur sa non popularité et le rejet/dégoût qu’il provoque.
    Tout est manipulation.
    4:53 PM · 22 avr. 2022·Twitter for Android
    https://twitter.com/RbdLau/status/1517517041175044097

  5. Same “ringding” system as seen in 2017 live on the screens of the media Sud-Ouest, video that I already forwarded to you after several “sane sored” posts.

    Fraude électorale lors du premier tour de l’élection présidentielle 2022
    23 avr. 2022
    Fraud Watch France

    https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=iAzAYYjNWXw

Comments are closed.