Request to Cancel Results of the Second Round of the French Presidential Elections

ER Editor: This request to cancel the results of the French presidential elections is based on the observations of television coverage during the evening whereby Marine Le Pen was shown to be marginally ahead of Macron at two particular moments. By the end of the evening, or rather early the next morning, Macron won by over 4 million. We had covered this here:

Monkey Business in the French Elections? Looks Like It

For those who wish to test their French and see the basis for this request by the association, BonSens.org, here is the PDF document.

********

REQUEST FOR CANCELLATION OF THE RESULTS OF THE SECOND ROUND OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS

April 27, 2022

REQUEST FOR THE ANNULMENT OF THE RESULTS OF THE SECOND ROUND OF THE PRESIDENTIAL ELECTIONS AND FOR THE RESUME OF THE ELECTORAL PROCEDURE ON ITS LAST ERRORS

The undersigned:

BonSens.org, association under local law in Alsace-Moselle, located at 10 rue des Cigognes, 67960 ENTZHEIM, represented by […]

Having as Lawyer:
AARPI PROTAT
Represented by Maître Diane PROTAT
Lawyer at the Paris Bar
90, boulevard Flandrin, 75116 Paris
01.47.04.23.66 / 01.47.27.87.88
Email: diane.protat@protat-avocats.com
Toque C-84

 

Has the honor to inform you that:

Article 58 of the Constitution provides that:

“The Constitutional Council sees to the regularity of the election of the President of the Republic.  It examines complaints and announces the results of the ballot.”

Moreover, in its decision n° 2022-184 -188 PDR of March 24, 2022, the Constitutional Council admitted that:

By virtue of the general mission of monitoring the regularity of the election of the President of the Republic, which is conferred on it by article 58 of the Constitution, the Constitutional Council may exceptionally rule on petitions calling into question the election to come, in cases where the inadmissibility which would be opposed to these requests would risk seriously compromising the effectiveness of its control of the election, would vitiate the general progress of the electoral operations or would undermine the normal functioning of the public authorities. At least one of these conditions is met with regard to the decree of January 26, 2022 convening voters.’

It is because of these textual considerations and this recent case law that the Constitutional Council is asked, on the basis of fraud, to annul the results of the second round of the presidential election as officially announced by Mr. Laurent Fabius, as President of the Constitutional Council.

https://reciproc.org/requete-aux-fins-dannulation-des-resultats-du-second-tour-des-elections-presidentielles/

************

Source

 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

2 Comments on Request to Cancel Results of the Second Round of the French Presidential Elections

  1. Hey they are catching on to Soros, and Obama, Macron and Trudeau’s fraudulent election resources..
    Gotta keep those NWO wet dream team members in office, now that the world has to spoon feed the
    latest puppet in Ukraine, Klause Schwab-Zelensky-George Soros

  2. Fraudes à la présidentielle : le greffe du Conseil Constitutionnel refuse de transmettre le recours citoyen
    https://lecourrierdesstrateges.fr/2022/04/29/fraudes-a-la-presidentielle-le-greffe-du-conseil-constitutionnel-refuse-de-transmettre-le-recours-citoyen/
    par
    Éric Verhaeghe
    29 avril 2022
    “Les fraudes à la présidentielle nourrissent de nombreuses inquiétudes et de nombreuses rumeurs hâtivement qualifiées de complotistes par la presse subventionnée qui a ouvertement appelé à voter Emmanuel Macron. Assez curieusement, le greffe du Conseil Constitutionnel semble avoir pris sur lui de déclarer irrecevable le recours déposé par plusieurs avocats, dont Carlo Brusa et Maud Marian (et de nombreux autres) sur la fameuse affaire France 2.
    (…)
    Les résultats français traités… aux USA !

    Comme le souligne Maud Marian, co-rédactrice du recours contre le résultat aux présidentielles, cette lacune juridique pose de sérieux problèmes au vu de l’évolution, et surtout de l’informatisation du processus électoral lui-même.

    S’agissant des machines à voter, son confrère Tarek Koraitem nous a déjà expliqué les problèmes juridiques gênants : installation illégale de machines à voter, flou sur les procédures de vérification de ces machines, incertitude complète sur leur fonctionnement et leur régularité.

    S’agissant du traitement informatique des résultats après le dépouillement, Maud Marian soulève un autre point gênant : l’agrégation des résultats par le ministère de l’Intérieur échappe à tout contrôle, et se déroule sur des serveurs… hébergés aux USA, sous contrôle américain !” (…)

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*