.
ER Editor: The Netherlands has its own Reiner Fuellmich.
Meryl Nass below embeds a report from Dutch site De Andere Krant from June 27. This site also has a preliminary piece from June 12 titled (browsers will translate) —
Lawyer who challenges Rutte and Gates arrested by special police team
Lawyer Arno van Kessel is lead counsel on a case which basically brings lawsuits against high profile figures such as Gates, Bourla and certain Dutch political figures, as well as the Dutch state. The case questions, among other things, the legitimacy of the entire Covid agenda, as well as the questionable status of the mRNA genetic shot that has caused so much injury and death. So he got dragged out of bed on Wednesday, June 11 (source linked to above) on likely spurious charges:
According to sources around Van Kessel, a team of some 15 police officers searched his house for hours. During Wednesday (June 11), the police released a news report stating that two men in their 60s from Leeuwarden have been arrested. One of them is Van Kessel. “Police detained eight individuals at various locations across the country on Wednesday, June 11. They are suspected of jointly committing criminal offenses aimed at collecting or wanting to use weapons and/or hazardous substances. The suspects are all in complete restrictions”, it says on police.nl.
The first day of the trial in these cases is scheduled for July 9, in eight days from now. Conveniently, van Kessel will be held in jail for another 90 days, ensuring it will not be possible for him to go to trial on the 9th. Predictably, the media are misrepresenting the case, if they cover it at all, and the Netherlands Bar Association is starting proceedings to have him disbarred. All predictable stuff, frankly.
***
This case started in 2023 (see Gates Netherlands). Many thanks to Dutch colleague Michel van der Kemp for input on this. Something caught out eye more pointedly as we reviewed those past headlines, and it was one curiously containing the number 17 (readers of sites like these will be perfectly attuned to this number, that it corresponds to the letter Q in the alphabet). Proof of nothing, but we find it mightily interesting, especially as this number has been cropping up in recent media stories, which we will publish soon. From exactly 2 years ago —
Netherlands: The state, Bourla, Gates & Rutte sued for vaccination damage
***
We remind readers of a piece we put out a few days ago, where Mark Rutte sort of referred to Trump as “Daddy”. We presented that as a series of comms with deliberate humiliation of the Dutch state and/or its royal family. ‘Central Casting’ as Trump put it. See —
NATO Summit Mocks The Dutch Swamp
We further remind readers that any and all illegalities around the Covid period were ANTICIPATED by the white hats. They knew the Covid bioweapon and the ‘vaccine’ bioweapon were coming out. EO13818, first instituted in late 2017, was the legal framework, with GLOBAL scope, that had the jurisdiction to deal with the Gates, Bourlas and Ruttes of this world. Likely the people named in this series of Dutch lawsuits, led by Arno van Kessel, have already been taken out.
Nevertheless, the Dutch people have to have this information organically revealed to them and, in addition, feel the weight of the tyrannical state that pretends to serve them. Such is the function of the Fuellmich narrative, we believe. That is not to demean either Fuellmich or van Kessel, but pretty high level games have been played for the past few years, to take down the nasties as well as to wake up a thoroughly sleeping population.
While this is a theory and speculation, it’s one which makes the most big picture sense in view of large-scale events.
********
Remember a case brought against Bill Gates and the Dutch head of NATO in the Netherlands? The lawyer (Arno van Kessel) was arrested without charges and will be unable to present the case in court.
How lucky can Billy Gates get? What exquisite timing. What did it cost?
MERYL NASS
https://deanderekrant.nl/advocaat-van-kessel-langer-in-gevangenis/
Dean of the Bar Association Initiates Suspension Proceedings Against Van Kessel
Arno van Kessel will be held in custody for another ninety days because the Public Prosecution Service continues to label him as “a suspect in an investigation into a criminal network,” so far without presenting any evidence.
This means that the Leeuwarden lawyer will certainly not be present at the public hearing on July 9 at the Leeuwarden District Court, where the first substantive session is scheduled in the internationally high-profile lawsuit against, among others, the State of the Netherlands, Mark Rutte [former Netherlands Prime Minister and currently the Secretary-General of NATO, who, due to his ability to remain in office until 2023 despite various political scandals, Rutte had been referred to as ‘Teflon Mark’ as “nothing ever seemed to stick to him”.—Nass] and Bill Gates. His law partner, Peter Stassen, will face it alone but says he is “equipped to appear that day.”
At the beginning of June, this newspaper reported that there was finally some progress in the internationally notable lawsuit by Leeuwarden lawyer Arno van Kessel (https://deanderekrant.nl/nieuw-hoofdstuk-in-rechtszaak-tegen-bill-gates-en-mark-rutte/) and his Eindhoven colleague Peter Stassen.
In 2023, the lawyer duo announced a civil action against, among others, Bill Gates, Mark Rutte, and the State of the Netherlands. On behalf of clients, they seek to compel the court to issue a clear ruling on the question: Was the covid-19 mRNA injection a vaccine for the health of the population, or a bioweapon? Van Kessel stated: “It is one or the other, and there is nothing in between.”
At the beginning of June 2025, the North Netherlands District Court, Leeuwarden location, finally announced that the first substantive hearing of the case was scheduled for July 9. On the morning of Wednesday, June 11, there was a completely unexpected turn of events. Arno van Kessel was taken from his bed early in the morning with a massive show of force by a special intervention team. The lawyer, his daughter, and wife were even held at gunpoint for a moment. A day later, the police issued a statement via the website politie.nl linking Van Kessel to “a criminal network.” According to a press release prepared by the prosecution, eight people were arrested that morning who “adhere to anti-institutional ideology and may have the intention to use violence.” One of them was quickly released; the other seven were held for two weeks in “restrictions,” meaning the suspects were not allowed any contact with the outside world. Van Kessel — as became known last week — was held in a cell in Vught.
In the mainstream media, various stories appeared in recent weeks about a network of so-called sovereign citizens. These “anti-institutional” individuals were allegedly planning something around the NATO summit. Weapons and explosives were supposedly found, but any form of hard evidence or substantiation has been absent to this day. Nevertheless, the suggestion that Van Kessel was part of a highly dangerous criminal group has been widely circulated. Meanwhile, some of the accusations have already been partly retracted. Last week, the AD reported that the prosecution had been unable to substantiate any plan to disrupt the NATO summit. “We have investigated whether there was an imminent threat. This has not been shown to be the case.”
On Thursday, June 26, after a long silence, the prosecution released further news. One suspect has been released, but “six suspects in the investigation into a criminal network, most of whom adhere to anti-institutional ideology and may have the intention to use violence, will remain in custody for another 90 days,” the Public Prosecution Service announced. Van Kessel is one of the suspects being held for another 90 days. The prosecution says it needs more time for investigation and that “given the status of the investigation, it is not possible to comment substantively on questions about the progress, suspicions, and findings.”
Remarkably, the mainstream media continue to label him a sovereign citizen, even though it became clear in the first days after the arrest that Van Kessel is not a sovereign. As a lawyer, he is explicitly following the institutional path with his lawsuit. Van Kessel is also not known to be violent. Everywhere, he openly and without hesitation professes his faith in Jesus Christ, which leads him to reject violence. The media say nothing about this. They also ignore the account of Van Kessel’s partner (see inset).
Peter Stassen — who is temporarily handling the affairs of Van Kessel’s law practice — told De Andere Krant that he, too, has had no contact with his colleague since June 11. According to Stassen, placing a suspect under restrictions is one of the most severe measures available to the prosecution: “So they must have very strong evidence.” So far, he has seen none. The prosecution told this newspaper that “the prosecution realizes it is a very heavy instrument and should not be used lightly,” but refuses to comment further on the case.
The Eindhoven lawyer has meanwhile been informed via the Dean of the Netherlands Bar Association — the body responsible for supervising the legal profession — that suspension proceedings have been initiated against Van Kessel. [Taking his law license—Nass] One way or another, it is therefore certain that Van Kessel will not be present on July 9. Stassen was very clear that, despite the lack of preparation, he will “be equipped for the day.” On July 1, Stassen will also give a lecture in Groningen about the latest developments. “That will proceed as planned. In it, I will explain a lot, including the defense submitted by the State, in which they make very clear personal attacks on the experts we intend to call,” Stassen said. More information can be found at Rechtoprecht.online.
Many suspect that lawyer Van Kessel has come too close to the truth regarding the corona dossier. This case therefore evokes associations with the prosecution of the German lawyer Reiner Fuellmich. In the next edition of De Andere Krant, we will provide a more detailed analysis of the substance of the case.
Source
Featured image source, van Kessel: https://pointer.kro-ncrv.nl/voorwaardelijke-straf-voor-advocaat-arno-van-kessel-vanwege-onprofessioneel-gedrag
Featured image source, Fuellmich: https://boxcast.tv/view-embed/chdtv-exclusive-crimes-against-humanity–dr-reiner-fuellmich-in-depth-interview-ulydsn5rsh70qsahggyy
************
••••
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Leave a Reply