Moderna trial injects first UK patients with experimental mRNA cancer ‘vaccine’

ER Editor: Some things are just too headshakingly stupid to be believed. We’re actually wondering about this. Imperial College (we’re the NHS, trust us) with the notoriously getting-it-wrong-every-time disease modeller, Professor Neil Ferguson? Moderna and Stephane Bancel with its/his reputation? Hmm. Anything containing mRNA and especially the highly toxic lipid nanoparticles shouldn’t find their way into the human body for any reason. And given the high rates of cancer now being found, especially in the young, we’re wondering if this isn’t a waking up the normies report.

mRNA COVID-19 Vaccines Caused More Deaths Than Saved: Peer-Reviewed Study


Moderna trial injects first UK patients with experimental mRNA cancer ‘vaccine’

Ex-Pfizer executive Dr. Mike Yeadon said the new mRNA shots present ‘insurmountable safety problems’ evidenced by COVID mRNA injection-induced harms.


LONDON (LifeSiteNews) — The first U.K. patients have been injected with an experimental mRNA cancer “therapy” at Imperial College Healthcare NHS Trust as part of a Moderna clinical safety trial, raising concerns that the mRNA could cause bodily harm similar to that of the mRNA COVID jabs.

Featured Image

The mRNA-4359 “therapeutic,” described by the Telegraph as a “vaccine,” is said to aim to “stimulat[e] effector T-cells that target and kill suppressive immune and tumor cells that express target antigens,” according to Moderna.

The mRNA jab works by “presenting common markers of tumours to the patient’s immune system” to train the immune system to “recognise and fight cancer cells expressing these markers,” Imperial College London explained.

Dr. Michael Yeadon, former vice president and chief scientist of Pfizer’s allergy and respiratory division, told LifeSiteNews that despite the “possibility” that the mRNA jab “might have conceptual merit,” it presents “insurmountable safety problems.

He argued, as he has in affidavits for legal cases regarding COVID mRNA shots, that “causing the body to express non-self proteins axiomatically drives lethal autoimmune attack upon every cell which responds to the injected genetic instructions.”

Even if Moderna said that mRNA-4359 is coded for “full length human proteins,” Dr. Yeadon said he would remain doubtful about this claim, since Moderna, like Pfizer and other pharma companies, have “associated themselves with intentionally harmful” COVID-19 shots.

Dr. Yeadon has often pointed out that pharma manufacturers have “withheld and willfully omitted safety and effectiveness information from patients and physicians” regarding the COVID injections.

He added that “shortly after administration of these products, thousands of people have died” and that it “is absolutely clear-cut that these [shots] are the cause of death” when one examines the relationship between the shots and the following deaths.

“Also, if the goal is to present common markers of cancer cells to the immune system, then there are some assumptions to check. Why is the patient’s immune system not already responding to these markers in their own cancer? If they cannot, because their immune system is compromised and they will also respond poorly to this therapy… why inject them?” Dr. Yeadon noted to LifeSiteNews.

Dr. Yeadon pointed out that, furthermore, “There is nothing about this treatment which restricts delivery only to cancerous tissue” and that “after injection it is as likely to be taken up by healthy tissue as those in which cancer has been identified.”

In the case of the mRNA COVID jabs, multiple scientists found that their mRNA-induced spike protein spreads throughout the body, causing inflammation in various organs. For example, in 2021, independent lab founder and seasoned pathologist Dr. Ryan Cole displayed lab images comparing the normal bodily tissues of those who had not received the COVID jab with the inflamed tissues of those who had.

Dr. Yeadon added that if mRNA-4359 was made with “lipid nanoparticle technology” as the other mRNA based shots were, “then it should be expected to accumulate in reproductive organs,” which “cannot be safe.”

The ex-Pfizer executive alluded to findings, including by a Japanese study, that the lipid nanoparticles of the mRNA shots concentrate in the ovaries, raising concerns about the shot’s impact on reproductive health.

A toxicology expert with over 30 years of scientific experience went so far as to warn during a 2022 roundtable discussion hosted by U.S. Sen. Ron Johnson of Wisconsin that the COVID-19 jabs could “potentially sterilize an entire generation.”

Concerns about the mRNA jabs’ harm to reproduction have been supported by studies finding high rates of menstrual abnormalities post-injection. In addition, a peer-reviewed study found a decline in male fertility in the months immediately following reception of Pfizer’s mRNA COVID shot.


Featured image source:



The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)


Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.


Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.


Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.