First it was a legislative ban on the mRNA shots in Minnesota; now, it’s a reclassification as a ‘biological weapon of mass destruction.’
********
BREAKING — Minnesota Files Bill HF3219 to Designate mRNA Injections as Biological Weapons of Mass Destruction
In a historic move, Minnesota lawmakers move to outlaw mRNA injections — classifying them as bioweapons subject to prosecution under the state’s weapons of mass destruction statute.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Minnesota Representative Shane Mekeland has introduced Bill HF3129, the “mRNA Bioweapons Prohibition Act,” to:
designate mRNA injections and products as weapons of mass destruction according to section 609.712 and to prohibit possession or distribution of the mRNA injections and products in the state.
Minnesota Statutes § 609.712 criminalizes the development, possession, or use of weapons of mass destruction, including biological agents, recombinant or synthetic nucleic acids, and delivery systems that may cause widespread death, serious injury, or disruption to public safety.
The statute defines “biological agents” broadly to include any virus or genetically engineered element capable of causing disease or biological malfunction in humans.
By referencing this statute, the legislature affirms that mRNA-based injections—particularly those using modified nucleosides to produce synthetic Spike proteins or alter gene expression—fit the statutory definition of a biological agent capable of mass harm. This bill, therefore, applies the existing legal framework of § 609.712 to classify and prohibit such products under criminal law within the state of Minnesota.
Filing this bill would not have been possible without the critical work of Dr. Joseph Sansone, who originally drafted the model legislation on which this bill is based. His tireless advocacy and early legal framework helped pave the way for states like Minnesota to take bold action against experimental gene-based technologies.
The only path to victory for any states’ legislative efforts is recognizing that mRNA injections and products are in fact biological and technological weapons in violation of a state’s bioweapon law. That wipes away all liability shields and claims of protections.
In light of the overwhelming evidence and the clear statutory framework, it is both scientifically and legally justified to classify mRNA injections as biological weapons of mass destruction. Bill HF3219 represents a historic step toward restoring public safety, medical integrity, and state sovereignty in the face of unprecedented biotechnological threats.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
••••
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
••••
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
••••
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Nicolas Hulscher, MPH
Leave a Reply