GAME OVER. WE WON.
One of my surveys had a strong signal. So I had a third party polling firm run it against a neutral audience. The results are devastating. It shows we were lied to. Big time. No other way to spin it.
Here is the pivot table of the Pollfish results so you can see the votes vs. vaccine status:
What this means is we’ve won. There is no way to defend this.
Unless I missed something, they are totally screwed. There is simply no way to “spin this” in your favor. This survey is simple to replicate and it completely destroys the “safe and effective” narrative because there is no way to “spin” the results in your favor. It’s devastating.
The CDC would argue, “You are asking the public to make a non-professional judgment on causality. We at the CDC have determined no causal link. All these deaths are simply coincidences!”
The fact checkers will then agree with them!
Simply explain why there are more 1.7X as many “coincidences” happening with the COVID vaccines than all 70+ vaccines over the past 32 years? Make my day. Back it up with actual data proving your point, not a hand-waving argument.
Or, show me your survey. And explain why, in the 18 months the vaccine has been on the market, you never reached out to find the incidence rate of adverse events and deaths in a pro-active survey rather than sitting back with a passive surveillance system. And explain to us why you never revealed to anyone the Medicare mortality data? What was the reason for keeping that a secret? Explain that one for us.
Sadly, the press will simply accept any hand-waving argument from the CDC no matter how idiotic it is. That’s how they will defend it. They will never ask the questions in my previous paragraph.
So it’s not over yet, but we are getting close.
Confirmation of the poll in the VAERS system
This isn’t a fluke.
The VAERS system essentially is throwing the same safety signal with a ratio that is pretty close to what our survey found.
It turns out that 69% of all deaths in VAERS (limiting ourselves to US-only deaths) are from the COVID vaccines.
So this means that the COVID vaccines have killed 2.3X as many people as all the 70+ other vaccines over the past 32 years.
How do you explain that? It can’t be over-reporting of background deaths because the adverse event profile of the COVID deaths doesn’t match “natural causes.” So these stupid hand-waving arguments don’t fly.
Here are the queries I used and the results.
Other troubling surveys for the mainstream narrative
The survey above is just the beginning.
Neutral audience validation of the following polls coming shortly as well.
The vaccines are harming more people than COVID is. Hospital treatment protocols are #2. Why can’t we let doctors be doctors?
The big killer: the vaccine. Hospital treatment protocols are #2. Why can’t we let doctors be doctors?
Doctors say that myocarditis from COVID is greater than from the vaccine. Funny thing though…. I couldn’t find any cardiologists who have seen more myocarditis rates before the vaccines rolled out. Looks like I’m not alone.
“The Elephant in the Room” presentation has more examples
Want more evidence that you’ve been misled? Check out my Elephant in the Room slide deck and you’ll very quickly discover why nobody wants to talk about the elephant in the room: that the CDC, medical community, Congress, state and local health officials, mainstream media, and mainstream social media companies are responsible for killing over 500,000 Americans by enticing them to take a vaccine that was far more likely to kill them than save them.
None of the interventions was needed. We had an effective early treatment protocol in March of 2020, but the NIH and CDC ignored it and still do to this day. There are no deaths or long-haul COVID if people are given that protocol. Over 10,000 people were treated without a death or hospitalization if the patient starts treatment promptly after first symptoms. The reason it is ignored is simple: Tony Fauci says that such protocols don’t work, even though they do. It’s not like they looked at the protocol and rejected it. It’s like they never even looked at the protocol.
You’ll also understand why nobody wants to debate me.
This survey is devastating because it is confirmed with a neutral audience. The survey and several more will now be repeated by an internationally famous polling firm.
So you now know who is going to win the game: the truth.
And it’s now just a matter of time. It will be fun to see people try to attack me in the meantime.
My advice to them is simple: if you find yourself in a hole, stop digging.
Next step: wait for the new famous pollster to release this poll, plus several others. They are highly respected.
The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)
Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.
Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.
Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.