European Human Rights Court Backs Romania’s Election Annulment

.

ER Editor: Peak madness, peak tyranny, peak show.

A reminder that anti-globalist Calin Georgescu was the front runner in the first round of Romania’s presidential elections last year. The second round got suddenly cancelled, a decision backed up by Romania’s Constitutional Court. An appeal was then lodged with the ECHR, and that failed just yesterday because a president is not part of the legislative body. The ECHR can only rule on the election of legislative bodies, not on electing presidents. The People can have their electoral freedoms protected when electing governmental bodies but not presidents, apparently. Go figure. Journalist Tamas Orban walks us through the ruling.

See our coverage of Calin Georgescu HERE.

***

This is linked to below, but we recommend this euractiv article for its coverage of what Russia’s external intelligence services (SVR) are claiming about Brussels being behind Georgescu’s recent arrest —

PM Ciolacu and MFA reject Russian secret service interference in Romania’s internal affairs

According to the SVR, the EU leadership was “obviously behind the decision” to press charges against Georgescu. The Russian intelligence agency further alleged that European Commission President Ursula von der Leyen had warned of potential restrictions on EU funds for Romania if Georgescu, whom they described as a representative of “non-systemic forces,” continued his campaign.

Following the attack on Georgescu, the SVR claimed that the European liberal establishment would likely intensify efforts to “stifle dissent in the EU”, suggesting that Hungary could be the next target in the upcoming parliamentary elections, as it remains a “bastion of European conservatism.”

********

The ECtHR argued that the right to free elections covers only legislatures, not executive offices, like the president’s.

TAMAS ORBAN for EUROPEAN CONSERVATIVE

The European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR) has dismissed the election frontrunner Călin Georgescu’s appeal to overturn the Romanian Constitutional Court’s (CCR) decision to annul the presidential race last December due to still unproven allegations of Russian interference after Georgescu won the first round with no establishment candidate qualifying for the runoffs.

The Court declared the nationalist candidate’s complaint “inadmissible” since presidential or other executive elections are not covered by the European Convention of Human Rights (ECHR), which guarantees the right to free elections only when it comes to choosing the composition of legislative bodies, such as parliaments and local councils.

 Supporters of Călin Georgescu protest the annulment of the Romanian presidential election.  Photo: Daniel Mihailescu / AFP

.

In the ruling published on Thursday, March 6th, the Court referred to Article 3 of Protocol No. 1 of the ECHR, which states that countries must “hold free elections … under conditions which will ensure the free expression of the opinion of the people in the choice of the legislature.”

Since there is “no indication” that the Romanian president’s powers make part of the country’s “legislature,” the election annulment does not violate human rights, the Court said.

This narrow interpretation of a single article was enough to throw out Georgescu’s core argument that democratic choice and freedom of expression are fundamental human rights under the ECHR, which even states in Art. 17 that “nothing in this Convention may be interpreted … to perform any act aimed at the destruction of any of the rights and freedoms set forth herein.” Yet, that’s exactly what the ECtHR seems to have done by upholding the CCR’s election annulment.

Last month, U.S. Vice President JD Vance also condemned the cancellation of elections based on the outcome and warned that it may happen in other countries as well, as populist parties gain more ground (ER: Did Vance foreshadow this?). Commenting on the absurdity of the new ECtHR ruling, X owner Elon Musk also weighed in by questioning the legitimacy of the European court.

What is this court and how can they annul elections? https://t.co/6SUp6gOGmB

— Elon Musk (@elonmusk) March 6, 2025

Meanwhile, Georgescu is under criminal investigation for undisclosed campaign finances and for alleged connections to an illegal neo-fascist organization led by members of his private security team who, according to prosecutors, aimed to overthrow the country’s constitutional order.

These charges were conveniently brought against Georgescu on the same day he tried to submit his candidacy in repeat elections in May, as he was detained by police thirty minutes after his announcement that he was heading to finalize the process as the official candidate of the largest opposition party, AUR (ECR).

ER inserts —

Romanian election front-runner Călin Georgescu taken in by police, facing charges

In response, AUR and the two smaller opposition parties organized yet another giant protest in the capital last Saturday, calling for dropping the “bogus” charges, resuming the elections, and the resignation of the government led by a grand coalition between PSD (S&D) and PNL (EPP).

Romanians Protest The State of Their Country

Meanwhile, the ruling establishment parties expressed their outrage on Wednesday over the Russian security services’ claim that the election was annulled on pressure from Brussels—despite the fact that this has also been admitted by former EU Commissioner Thierry Breton, who also threatened other countries, like Germany, with the same treatment.

Moreover, freedom of information requests from MCC Brussels also revealed that there are at least two infringement cases launched under the Digital Services Act (DSA) involving the canceled Romanian elections. Although the EU Commission still withholds any additional information about them, the existence of these cases already implies EU involvement, if not outright interference in the electoral process.

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.