Dr. Mike Yeadon Makes an Appeal to Dr. Robert Malone

ER Editor: Readers should be aware that Dr. Paul Alexander has made countless pointed blog posts about Dr. Robert Malone’s involvement in the damaging mRNA shots and that Malone needs to come out and account for them.

See the latest from Dr. Alexander —

How about Kariko, Malone, Weissman, Sahin, Bourla, Bancel etc., how about these creeps, these IMO people who must answer serious questions on mRNA technology etc., give back tax payer money to victims

Dr. Mike Yeadon is a little more placatory, yet pointedly urges Malone to use his influence and stop the massed global crime.

A reminder that Malone is still going ahead with two lawsuits, for $25 million each, against the Breggins and Dr. Jane Ruby. According to Dr. Alexander, Malone has warned Alexander behind the scenes to stop attacking him.

********

My plea to Dr Robert Malone.

I fear he & David Martin are using their extensive platforms inter alia to reinforce the idea that there’s been a novel & often lethal respiratory virus striding across the globe. It wasn’t true. But they speak as though it is true. This is why I’ve paid such close attention to the topic. Please don’t shoot the messenger 🙏

Best wishes

Mike

Dr Mike Yeadon —just now — Edit

Dear Robert, I’m impressed by your work rate and your insightful passion. I’m troubled by one really important thing, though! You’re surely aware of the epidemiological analyses by Denis Rancourt and colleagues? This shows by analysis of state by state all causes mortality (age, sex, date only, ignoring claims of cause of death, since this is subject to manipulation) that there was no excess death anywhere until after WHO called a pandemic. They did so based on “confirmed cases”, which you & I know is essentially fraud, since PCR cannot be used as a clinical diagnostic. What Rancourt’s findings rule out is a pandemic.

His analyses show this in several ways (one of which I’ve just mentioned). Another is the age profile of the dead: completely inconsistent with a respiratory viral illness. Third is that all causes mortality varies according to jurisdiction and that points firmly to policy and not a spreading pathogen as cause of death.

The bottom lines are two-fold. 1. There is no evidence of any kind of pandemic 2. Therefore there wasn’t a novel respiratory virus, either. It was all lies.

There’s copious evidence of planning for a “pandemic” going back over 25 years. All had authoritarian regimes and mass vaccination as objectives. Now, Event 201 (autumn 2019) crowned these tabletop simulations, the fictional occurrence was “a novel coronavirus emerges in China & spreads around the world”. We’re expected to believe this astonishing concurrence with claimed reality just 3-4 months later is luck. I find it not credible.

The pandemic is a lie, like the other nine or so lies that were promulgated by main media. The evidence that matters shows there wasn’t a pandemic. The authorities knew there wasn’t a pandemic.

In light of this, all the oppressive “measures” should rightly be seen as planned terrorism. Not “mistakes”. No mistakes were made. The objective was to get a needle in every arm. You & I know that causing expression of a non-self protein axiomatically drives lethal autoimmune attack on every cell that took up the injected material, this is Immunology 101. It’s how our immune system distinguishes friend (self) from foe (non-self). The mRNA based injections were formulated with lipid nano particles (LNP). We’ve known for years in peer reviewed papers that LNP formulated macromolecules migrate everywhere in the body, but accumulate in certain organs, notably ovaries.

It is my contention that there never was a novel respiratory virus pandemic. Furthermore, it is my contention that the massed lies of governments around the world bore down on people and frightened & coerced or even mandated them to receive deliberately toxic injections. Their design brief was to cause injury, to maim & to kill.

I’d be VERY keen to hear you comment about Rancourt’s analyses and my assessment of foreign protein encoded mRNA products.

It’s very important that you level with your large audience which you’ve worked hard to create and cultivate (bless you!).

Please tell them there wasn’t a novel virus & that the injections were carefully designed to hurt people.

If you don’t do these things, I fear you’re inadvertently amplifying the perpetrators intentions. They’ll tell us “There’s another virus, come get your jabs”. You almost alone can bring this massed global crime to a halt. Please use your substantial powers so to do.

Best wishes and thanks Mike Dr Mike Yeadon (Pls search using eg Yandex & not eg Google. Why the extensive differences in what’s returned and what’s the meaning of such differences).

Source – Telegram channel, June 6 2023

************

 

••••

The Liberty Beacon Project is now expanding at a near exponential rate, and for this we are grateful and excited! But we must also be practical. For 7 years we have not asked for any donations, and have built this project with our own funds as we grew. We are now experiencing ever increasing growing pains due to the large number of websites and projects we represent. So we have just installed donation buttons on our websites and ask that you consider this when you visit them. Nothing is too small. We thank you for all your support and your considerations … (TLB)

••••

Comment Policy: As a privately owned web site, we reserve the right to remove comments that contain spam, advertising, vulgarity, threats of violence, racism, or personal/abusive attacks on other users. This also applies to trolling, the use of more than one alias, or just intentional mischief. Enforcement of this policy is at the discretion of this websites administrators. Repeat offenders may be blocked or permanently banned without prior warning.

••••

Disclaimer: TLB websites contain copyrighted material the use of which has not always been specifically authorized by the copyright owner. We are making such material available to our readers under the provisions of “fair use” in an effort to advance a better understanding of political, health, economic and social issues. The material on this site is distributed without profit to those who have expressed a prior interest in receiving it for research and educational purposes. If you wish to use copyrighted material for purposes other than “fair use” you must request permission from the copyright owner.

••••

Disclaimer: The information and opinions shared are for informational purposes only including, but not limited to, text, graphics, images and other material are not intended as medical advice or instruction. Nothing mentioned is intended to be a substitute for professional medical advice, diagnosis or treatment.

Be the first to comment

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published.


*